G.А. Kravtsov, N.V. Kravtsova, O.V. Khodakovskaya,
V.V. Nikitchenko, A.N. Prymushko

Èlektron. model. 2021, 43(4):69-88


The authors consider as the main hypothesis about the possibility of constructing the mathematics of the brain, the statement that the supposed basis of any context of thinking is primarily formed by a system of axioms, which is the foundation of abstract thinking, realized or materialized through some language. The authors investigate the problem of the appli­cability of language as the main instrument of cultural continuity and form a research program that includes: the development of a unified ontology that describes objects, actions, qualities and relationships; studying the nature of the context and presenting it with unam­biguous concepts of a unified ontology; determining the applicability of actions to objects as partially-defined functions to mathematical categories; model of subjective choice of semantic categories according to relevance in a certain context.


brain, strong artificial intelligence, language, axiom system, objective reality, inner world, mathematical modeling.


  1. Kravtsov G.O., Kravtsova N.V., Khodakivska O.V. (2021), “Mathematics of the brain and language”, Elektronne modelyuvannya, Vol. 43, 3, pp. 87-108.
  2. Koks, T. (2020), Zachem my govorim. Istoriya rechi ot neandertal'tsev do iskusstvennogo intellekta [Why We Speak: The History of Speech from Neanderthals to Artificial Intelligence], Translated by Myagkova, E.Yu., KoLibri, Azbuka-Attikus, Moscow, Russia.
  3. Luriya, A. (2020), Yazyk i soznaniye [Language and Consciousness], Piter, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
  4. Gubaylovskiy, V.A. (2019), Iskusstvennyy intellekt i mozg cheloveka [Artificial intelligence and the human brain], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
  5. Grinfild, S. (2018), Odin den' iz zhizni mozga. Neyrobiologiya soznaniya ot rassveta do zakata [One day in the life of the brain. The neurobiology of consciousness from dawn to dusk], Piter, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
  6. Guzenko, Yu.I. (2020), “Galley yak is the main ship of the Ottoman fleet”, Naukovyy visnyk Mykolayivsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu imeni V.O. Sukhomlynsʹkoho, Istorychni nauky, Vol. 3, no 38, pp. 89—94.
  7. Ter-Minasova, S.G. (2000), Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya [Language and intercultural communication], Slovo, Moscow, Russia.
  8. Berwick, R.C., and Chomsky, N. (2017), Why Only Us: Language and Evolution, The MIT Press.
  9. Gelb, I.J. (2017), Istoriya pis'mennosti. Ot risunochnogo pis'ma k polnotsennomu alfavitu [History of writing. From pictorial writing to full-fledged alphabet], Translated by Shulikovoy, T.M., ZAO Tsentrpoligraf, Moscow, Russia.
  10. “History and future of the dictionary”, November 17, 2015, available at: http://день словаря. рф/ история-и-будущее-словаря/.
  11. Glusac, Melina (2019), “10 words in the English language with the most definitions”, January 10, 2019, available at:
  12. Reznikova, Zh.I. (2004), “The language of animals: approaches, results, prospects ... "Languages of Science - Languages of Art", Sbronik trudov VII mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Nelineynyy mir» [Proceedings of the VII International Conference "Nonlinear World"], Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta komp'yuternykh issledovaniy,   260-278, available at:
  13. Hockett, C.D. (1960), “The origin of speech”, Scientific American, Vol. 203, 99-196.
  14. Hopcroft, J., Motwani, R., Ullman, J. (2002), Introduction to Automata Theory, Langua­ges and Computation, Williams, Moscow, Russia.
  15. Serebryakov, V.A., Galochkin, M.P., Gonchar, D.R., and Furugyan, M.G. (2006), Teoriya i realizatsiya yazykov programmirovaniya [Theory and implementation of programming languages], MZ-Press, Moscow, Russia.
  16. Lapshin, V. (2013), “Formal languages and grammars.” Habr, available at:
  17. Lapshin, V. (2013), “Chomsky's generative grammars.” Habr, available at:
  18. McLain, S. (2004), Kategorii dlya rabotayushchego matematika [Categories for the wor­king mathematician], Fizmatlit, Moscow, Russia.
  19. Lurie, J. (2009), Higher Thopos Theory, Princeton University Press.
  20. Reihl, E. (2016), Category Theory in Context (Aurora: Dover Modern Math Originals), Dover Publications.
  21. Fong, B. and Spivak, D.I. (2019), An Invitation to Applied Category Theory: Seven Sketches in Compositionality. 1st ed, Cambridge University Press.
  22. Kravtsov, G.A., Koshel, V.I. and Dolgorukov, O.V. (2018), “Multiple-theoretical understanding of the "classification", "taxonomy" and "ontology" ”, Information Technology and Security, 5, no. 2, pp.59-66.
  23. Kravtsov, G.A. (2016), “Model of computations on classifications”, Elektronne modelyuvannya, 38, no. 1, pp. 35-46.
  24. Chernigovskaya, T. (2020), “Brain vs artificial intelligence. Yegor Gaidar Forum 2020”, available at:
  25. LAKHTA VIEW: Human. “Martovskaya vstrecha otkrytogo mezhdunarodnogo obrazovatel'nogo proyekta LAKHTA VIEW”. available at: watch?v= p2P1wqLsdY8&t=1664s.
  26. Seliverstova, A.S. (2019), “The theory of dynamic chaos in studies of socio-philosophical and social orientation”, Hrani, 22, no. 2, pp. 40-47.
  27. Lebedev, S.A. (2016), “The problem of the subject and object in scientific knowledge”, Bulletin of TvGU, 1, pp. 19-26.
  28. Shumilova, A. (2009), “Lexical synonymy: traditional and cognitive vision of the problem”, Iskusstvovedeniye, Vol. 22, no. 160, pp. 144-148.
  29. Lapshin, V.A. (2010), Ontologiya v komp'yuternykh sistemakh [Ontology in computer systems], Nauchnyy mir, Moscow, Russia.
  30. Frankfurt, U.I. (1968), Spetsial'naya i obshchaya teoriya otnositel'nosti: istoricheskiye ocherki [Special and General Theory of Relativity: Historical Essays], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
  31. Chudinov, E.M. (1974), Teoriya otnositel'nosti i filosofiya [Theory of relativity and philosophy], Politizdat, Moscow, Russia.

Full text: PDF