AUTOMATED ASSESSMENT OF THE PIPELINE METALʼS RESIDUAL RESOURCE

S.A. Nedoseka

Èlektron. model. 2025, 47(5):40-55

https://doi.org/10.15407/emodel.47.05.040

ABSTRACT

The automation of determining the damage and residual resources of pipeline materials, in particular, heat and water supply pipelines is discussed. The results of research are presented, which made it possible to propose a universal nomogram for determining the residual resource of pipeline elements based on known damage. An experimentally verified method for determining the damage to pipeline metal with different operating hours using various instrumental methods is also proposed. A program has been developed that allows automated damage assessment using up to ten different evaluation methods and, based on its calculations, assessment of the residual resource. It is shown how the developed tools can be used in the actual control of pipeline system components.

KEYWORDS

damage, residual resource, instrumental methods, automation, program.

REFERENCES

  1. Vladimirsky, O., Vladimirsky, I., Artemchuk, V., Kryvoruchko, I., Semenyuk, D. (2024) Features and development of technologies for detecting leaks in heat and water supply pipelines under conditions of wear and tear and military influences. Electronic modeling. 46(5), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.15407/emodel.46.05.064 [In Ukrainian]
  2. Vladimirsky, A., Vladimirsky, I. (2024) Correlation parametric method for determining the velocity of acoustic wave propagation in a pipeline. Electronic modeling. 46(6), pp. 55-63. https://doi.org/10.15407/emodel.46.06.055
  3. Vladimirsky, A., Vladimirsky, I., Artemchuk, V., Kryvoruchko, I., Semenyuk, D. (2025) Adaptation of correlation leak detectors to diagnostics under conditions of military influences and wear of heat and water supply pipelines. Electronic modeling. 47(3), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.15407/emodel.47.03.067 [In Ukrainian]
  4. Skalsky, V. (2003) Assessment of the accumulation of volumetric damage of solids by acoustic emission signals. Technical diagnostics and nondestructive testing. (4), 29-36. [In Ukrainian]
  5. Zelenin, I., Voynalovych, O. (2019) Methodical approach to determining the characteristics of damage of cyclically loaded metal specimens. Proceedings of the International Conference “In-Service Damage of Materials…”. Ternopil, 28-37. [In Ukrainian]
  6. Zelenin, I. (2015) Ultrasonic and metallographic methods for detecting damage to materials. Theses of the IV International Scientific and Technical Conference “Metals”. Ternopil, 266 p. ISBN 978-966-305-073-7. [In Ukrainian]
  7. Pisarenko, G., Voinalovych, O., Mailo, A. (2024) Stochastic regularities in the non-contact determination of damage characteristics in the surface layer of steel 45 under high-cycle loading. Strength of Materials. 56(6), 1108-1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-025-00721-4
  8. Petriv, O., Moroz, O. (2018) Assessment of damage of welded joints by acoustic emission method. Bulletin of DNUZT. (16), 65-72. [In Ukrainian]
  9. Lemaitre, J. (1985) A Continuous Damage Mechanics Model for Ductile Fracture. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology. (107), 83-89.
  10. Chaboche, J., Lemaitre, J. (1992) A Continuous Damage Model for Ductile Materials. International Journal of Damage Mechanics. 1(2), 81-111.
  11. Ju, J. (2008) General Continuum Theory for Static and Cyclic Damage Evolution. Archive of Applied Mechanics. Vol. 77, pp. 121-139.
  12. Kachanov, L. (1958) On the Time to Rupture Process under Creep Conditions. Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 24(3), 132-135. [In Russian]
  13. Murakami, Y. (2002) Metal Fatigue: Effects of Small Defects and Nonmetallic Inclusions. Butterworth-Heinemann, Section 3: Damage Evaluation and Tolerance.
  14. GOST 25.601-79 (DSTU GOST 25.601-79) “Methods of testing metals for fatigue. Determination of the degree of damage.” [In Russian]
  15. DSTU ISO TR 15608:2015 “Metals and alloys. Guidelines for assessing damage to structures.” [In Ukrainian]
  16. ISO 23254:2015 “General principles for determination of residual lifetime of structures.”
  17. ISO 13822:2010 “Bases for design of structures — Assessment of existing structures.”
  18. EN 1993-1-9:2005 (Eurocode 3) “Design of steel structures — Part 1-9: Fatigue.”
  19. API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 (2016) “Fitness-for-Service.” Comprehensive standard for damage assessment for metal structures.
  20. DIN 50113:2009 “Testing of metallic materials — Evaluation of damage.”
  21. ASTM E1823-20 “Standard Terminology Relating to Fatigue and Fracture Testing.”
  22. DSTU 2860-94 “Technical reliability. Terms. Residual life» [In Ukrainian]
  23. DSTU 8646:2016 «Technical reliability. Assessment and forecasting of technical systems residual life». [In Ukrainian]
  24. SO 23254:2015 «General principles for determination of residual lifetime of structures»
  25. API 579-1/ASME FFS-1:2016 «Fitness-for-Service»
  26. Lebedev, A., Muzyka, N., Volchek, N., Nedoseka, S. (2003) Evaluation of the current state of the operating gas pipelines metal. Research method and results. Problems of strength. (2), 29-36. [In Russian]
  27. Nedoseka, S., Nedoseka, A. (2010) Complex assessment of damage and final resource of metals with operational development. Technical diagnostics and non-destructive testing. (1), 9-16. [In Russian]
  28. Nedoseka, A.Ya., Nedoseka, S.A. (2020) Fundamentals of calculation and diagnostics of welded structures: textbook. 5th ed., revised. and additional, edited by B. E. Paton. Kyiv, Indprom. [In Russian]
  29. Nedoseka, A.Ya., Nedoseka, S.A. (2021) Fundamentals of calculation and diagnostics of welded structures: textbook. 5th ed., revised. and additional, edited by B. E. Paton. Chapter 7. Kyiv, Indprom. [In Russian]
  30. Nedoseka, A., Nedoseka, S., Yaremenko, M. (2011) Continuous monitoring of main gas pipelines and gas compressor stations by acoustic emission method. Technical diagnostics and nondestructive testing, (4), 3-13. [In Russian]
  31. Lobanov, L., Nedoseka, A., Nedoseka, S. at al. (2003). DSTU 4223-2003. Boilers, pressure vessels and pipelines. Technical diagnostics. General requirements. National standard of Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]
  32. Lobanov, L., Nedoseka, A., Nedoseka, S. at al. (2003). DSTU 4227-2003. Guidelines for conducting acoustic emission diagnostics of high-risk facilities. National standard of Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]
  33. Nedoseka, A., Nedoseka, S., Yaremenko, M. (2011) On control of equipment and pipelines of compressor stations by the method of acoustic emission. International scientific and technical conference "Residual resource and problems of modernization of main and industrial pipeline systems. April 12-13. Kyiv. 31-40. [In Ukrainian]
  34. Nedoseka, S., Nedoseka, A., Yaremenko M. at al (2021). Integration of the AE method into the technology of repair and extension of the resource of metal structures. Technical diagnostics and nondestructive testing. (1) 11-16. [In Ukrainian]

Full text: PDF